This case highlights serious concerns about accountability and transparency within the New Hampshire Department of Corrections (DOC). Despite the Personnel Appeals Board (PAB) twice ruling that Lt. Thomas Macholl’s termination was unjustified, the DOC continues to fight the decision, now arguing that the PAB erred by not holding an evidentiary hearing.
Key points from the case include:
- Misconduct Allegations: The PAB found that DOC administrators hid evidence that could have exonerated Macholl, including a key witness’s opinion that no illegal chokehold occurred.
- Legal Arguments: Assistant Attorney General Mary Triick claims the DOC deserves an evidentiary hearing to argue Macholl’s state of mind during the incident. However, union lawyer Gary Snyder counters that the facts are undisputed, making a hearing unnecessary under PAB rules.
- Accountability Concerns: Despite findings of misconduct by senior DOC officials, no one has been held responsible for suppressing evidence.
The outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision could have lasting implications for labor rights, administrative accountability, and law enforcement integrity within the state.
Blue & Gold NLR Team is a dedicated journalist at blueandgoldnlr.com, where he provides insightful and up-to-date news coverage. With a passion for uncovering the truth and a commitment to delivering accurate information, Blue & Gold NLR Team brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the team. His work ensures readers stay informed about the latest events and developments.