A heated exchange has erupted between Republican Representative Nancy Mace and Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez over a controversial bill introduced by Mace.
The bill, which seeks to ban House members and staff from using single-sex facilities such as bathrooms and locker rooms that do not correspond with their biological sex, has sparked significant debate.
Mace, who has garnered support from several Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, argues that biological men should not be allowed in women’s restrooms. Her proposal comes after the election of Sarah McBride, the first transgender member of Congress, who will represent Delaware.
Mace’s stance on the issue has drawn sharp criticism, particularly from Ocasio-Cortez, who warns that such a measure endangers women and girls by creating a scenario where individuals could be harassed or assaulted in an effort to determine who is transgender.
Ocasio-Cortez’s criticisms focus on the practical implications of the bill, questioning how it would be enforced and expressing concern about the potential for invasive measures. In response, Mace mocked Ocasio-Cortez, saying she “lives rent-free” in her opponent’s mind.
Mace also emphasized her personal experience as a survivor of sexual abuse, claiming the bill is necessary to protect women’s privacy and safety in these spaces.
The conflict has drawn responses from both sides, with Democrats like Ocasio-Cortez and Vermont Representative Becca Balint condemning the bill as harmful, while Republicans like Greene back Mace’s measure. Former communications director for Mace, Natalie Johnson, criticized the bill as a ploy for media attention rather than a genuine effort to protect women.
McBride, who will be the first openly transgender member of Congress, has also weighed in, calling the proposal a “distraction” from more pressing issues like healthcare and housing. She added that while she disagrees with the bill, she would comply with the rules set by leadership in Congress.
The bill has sparked a broader debate about the intersection of gender identity, privacy, and public safety, with many opposing it on grounds that it could lead to unnecessary scrutiny and harm to transgender individuals.
Mace, however, remains resolute in her stance, suggesting that the bill will be revisited if it fails to pass during this Congress.