Michael Cohen, the former lawyer of Donald Trump, appeared for his third day of testimony in a Manhattan courthouse. Cohen, who has now become a crucial witness against his former boss, faced extensive questioning about his track record of dishonesty and inaccuracies.
Trump’s legal team, under the guidance of Todd Blanche, employed a sophisticated approach to question Cohen’s credibility. Their goal was to show that Cohen’s previous actions make him an untrustworthy witness.
Blanche pointed out situations where Cohen gave contradictory testimonies in different legal proceedings, such as before Congress and federal agents. In addition, Blanche carefully examined Cohen’s secretive practice of recording phone calls and raised doubts about the accuracy of his memories from several years ago.
The main objective of Trump’s defence team is to discredit Cohen’s testimony, which accuses Trump of being involved in a plan to hide hush money payments and manipulate business records.
When faced with scrutiny, Cohen reluctantly confessed to telling some falsehoods, explaining that he had been previously punished for his actions.
However, he sometimes challenged the accusations, getting involved in discussions about the meaning of previous statements. During the proceedings, Cohen maintained a calm and unwavering demeanour, refusing to let anyone or anything rattle him.
In the face of attempts by Trump’s defence team to provoke a response from Cohen, he maintained his composure and determination. Despite being faced with personal and embarrassing aspects of his life, Cohen remained unwavering in his demeanour.
One memorable moment occurred when Blanche played a clip from Cohen’s podcast, where Cohen fervently expressed his wish for Trump to be imprisoned. This revelation allowed the jury to gain a deeper understanding of Cohen’s character, which had not been fully apparent during his testimony.
Overall, Cohen’s performance on the third day of testimony in the Trump hush money trial demonstrated his ability to handle intense scrutiny and highlighted the intricate nature of the case.
